TD 2009/3:
Income tax: employee share schemes: for the purpose of subsection
139CD(6) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, does a taxpayer become
the holder of a beneficial interest in shares merely by acquiring a
contractual right to obtain shares in a company (the particular,
individual shares not being ascertained at the time)?
|
|
Please note that the PDF version is the authorised version of
this ruling. |
| |
|
|
There is a Compendium for this document. TD 2009/3EC |
FOI status: may be released
Preamble
|
This
publication provides you with the following level of protection:
This publication (excluding appendixes) is a public ruling for
the purposes of the Taxation
Administration Act 1953.
A public ruling is an expression of the Commissioner's opinion
about the way in which a relevant provision applies, or would
apply, to entities generally or to a class of entities in
relation to a particular scheme or a class of schemes.
If you rely on this ruling, the Commissioner must apply the law
to you in the way set out in the ruling (unless the Commissioner
is satisfied that the ruling is incorrect and disadvantages you,
in which case the law may be applied to you in a way that is
more favourable for you - provided the Commissioner is not
prevented from doing so by a time limit imposed by the law). You
will be protected from having to pay any underpaid tax, penalty
or interest in respect of the matters covered by this ruling if
it turns out that it does not correctly state how the relevant
provision applies to you. |
Ruling
1. No.
Date of effect
2. This Determination applies to years of income commencing both before
and after its date of issue. However, this Determination will not apply
to taxpayers to the extent that it conflicts with the terms of a
settlement of a dispute agreed to before the date of issue of this
Determination (see paragraphs 75 and 76 of Taxation Ruling TR 2006/10).
Commissioner of Taxation
11 March 2009
Appendix 1 - Explanation
|
This
Appendix is provided as information to help you understand how
the Commissioner's view has been reached. It does not form part
of the binding public ruling. |
Legislative references
3. All legislative references are to the Income
Tax Assessment Act 1936 .
Background
4. Employee share schemes commonly allow for the grant of share options
to employees. Typically these are call options. A call option over a
share gives the holder the right, but not the obligation, to obtain a
share in a specified company at a predetermined date or during a
predetermined period (the maturity date or exercise period) and at a
predetermined amount (the exercise price).
5. The concept of an option is not legally precise. There is more than
one legal means to achieve what may loosely be described as the grant of
an option to obtain a share in a company.
6. Normally, under employee share schemes the terms of the option are
governed by a contract between the parties conferring the relevant right
on the employee, and there is no express trust or other more elaborate
arrangement. This Determination is concerned only with call options of
this nature; that is, where the employee's express rights in relation to
any relevant share are purely contractual.
7. The tax consequences of acquiring a right to obtain a share in a
company 'under an employee share scheme'1 are
governed by Division 13A of Part III (Division 13A).
8. If the right is a 'qualifying right', the employee taxpayer may
choose one of two alternative concessions under Division 13A. The first
alternative is that the taxable value of the right (which is called the
'discount' given in relation to the right) may be included in the
taxpayer's assessable income in the income year in which the 'cessation
time'2 occurs
rather than the year in which the option is acquired.3 The
second alternative is available only if the 'exemption conditions'4 are
satisfied for the right and the taxpayer makes an election under section
139E covering the right. In that case, the total amount of the discounts
given in relation to such rights is included in the taxpayer's
assessable income for the year of acquisition but only to the extent
that their total is greater than $1,000.5
9. For a right to be a qualifying right, the conditions in section 139CD
must be satisfied.
10. One of those conditions is that immediately after acquiring the
right, the taxpayer must not hold a legal or beneficial interest in more
than 5% of the shares in the company to which the right relates:
subsection 139CD(6). By acquiring an option to obtain a share, does an
employee acquire a beneficial interest in a share for the purposes of
this condition?
Analysis
11. The expression 'hold a legal or beneficial interest' in a share is
not defined for the purposes of subsection 139CD(6). The Commissioner
understands the expression to cover any kind of proprietary right over a
share, whether recognised by law or equity.
12. Some grants of options are to be regarded as arising under a
contract for the sale of the underlying property that is conditional on
the grantee later exercising the option. Some other grants of options
are to be regarded as the grantor making a contractually binding promise
to keep open an offer to sell the underlying property should the grantee
later elect (that is, by exercising the option) to accept that offer,
thus creating at that time a contract for the sale of the property.6
13. For the purposes of applying subsection 139CD(6) to a simple
arrangement of the kind covered by this Determination, it does not
matter which of these situations exists. Even if the grant of a
particular option to acquire a share is correctly regarded as
immediately creating a conditional contract for the sale of a share,
merely entering into a contract for the sale of unascertained personal
property does not create in the grantee any proprietary right, whether
legal or equitable, in that property.
14. The grantee of the option in such a case is not, before exercising
the option, the legal owner of any particular share. Nor would any
principle of equity recognise the grantee as holding any proprietary
interest over any particular share immediately after the option is
granted. There is no authority to suggest that a constructive trust
arises in this case.
15. Accordingly, on acquiring a merely contractual right to obtain a
share in a company under an employee share scheme, the particular share
being not yet ascertained, a taxpayer does not become the holder of a
legal or beneficial interest in a share for the purposes of subsection
139CD(6).
More elaborate arrangements
16. The above analysis is concerned with the simplest kinds of option
arrangements found in typical employee share schemes. The position might
be different for some arrangements that are more elaborate. For example,
if immediately on the grant of options particular shares are held on an
express trust for the benefit of a particular employee; or if the
contractual arrangements relate to particular, ascertained shares and
the remedy of specific performance might be available to the grantee for
a breach of the contract (as in the case of a contract for the sale of
particular existing shares in a private company: see Neville
v. Wilson [1996] 3 All ER
171). Such arrangements are beyond the scope of this Determination.
Footnotes
[1]
See section 139C. An option is acquired 'under an employee share scheme'
if a taxpayer acquires it at a discount and in respect of, or for or in
relation directly or indirectly to, any employment of, or any services
provided by, the taxpayer or of an associate of the taxpayer.
[2]
See section 139CB.
[3]
See subsection 139B(3).
[4]
See section 139CE.
[5]
See section 139BA.
[6]
See Laybutt
v. Amoco Australia Pty Ltd (1974)
132 CLR 57; 4 ALR 482.
TD 2008/D18
References
ATO references:
NO 2008/18271
ISSN: 1038-8982
Related Rulings/Determinations:
TR 2006/10
Subject References:
acquisition of shares
employee share schemes & options
qualifying rights
Legislative References:
ITAA 1936
ITAA 1936 Pt III Div 13A
ITAA 1936 139B(3)
ITAA 1936 139BA
ITAA 1936 139C
ITAA 1936 139CB
ITAA 1936 139CD
ITAA 1936 139CD(6)
ITAA 1936 139CE
ITAA 1936 139E
Case References:
Laybutt v. Amoco Australia Pty Ltd
(1974) 132 CLR 57
4 ALR 482
Neville v. Wilson
[1996] 3 All ER 171